Hi Jorge,
please use the Program SAPF124 in ECC6. If you want to clear smaller differences, you can execute the transaction F13E.
Please check also the documentation of the report SAPF124.
Regards,
Monika
↧
Re: SAPF124E not found!
↧
ALV grid report NO_FIELDCATALOG_AVAILABLE
Hi,
I have copied a report and all its includes, screens, etc to another program so that I can experiment on some changes required to be done on the existing report. However, I am unable to successfully execute the copy of the report due to the dump "A RAISE statement in program "CL_GUI_ALV_GRID===============CP" has raised exception condition "NO_FIELDCATALOG_AVAILABLE".
Can anyone advise what to check so that I can proceed? Since this is just a copy and I have not done any changes yet, can anyone explain why I'm getting a dump?
Btw, in the dump, this is the detail on which the dump is generated.
method set_sort_criteria.
*... (1) Trace?
if not mr_trace is initial.
call method mr_trace->add_trace_item
exporting
i_trace_item = 'SET_SORT_CRITERIA'
ir_variant = m_cl_variant
it_data = mt_data
it_info = mt_info.
endif.
if m_cl_variant->mt_fieldcatalog is initial.
raise no_fieldcatalog_available.
endif.
m_cl_variant->mt_sort = it_sort.
call function 'LVC_SORT_COMPLETE'
exporting
it_fieldcat = m_cl_variant->mt_fieldcatalog
changing
ct_sort = m_cl_variant->mt_sort.
endmethod.
I put a breakpoint on the report, and it appears that this is where the dump is actually generated.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
i_callback_program = sy-repid
i_callback_user_command = 'ALV_USER_COMMAND'
it_fieldcat = t_fieldcat
is_layout = is_layout
* it_events = t_events[]
is_variant = variant
i_save = 'A'
TABLES
t_outtab = t_out.
Thanks for any advise.
Cholen
↧
↧
SAP SSO With out integrating with LDAP/Active Directory
Dear All,
Good Day.
We have following components in our landscape.
SAP ECC 6.0 EHP7 (HANA DB)
SAP BI 7.4 (HANA DB)
SAP EP 7.4 (Syabse DB)
SAP BO 4.1 (Sybase SQL anywhere)
SAP Solman 7.1 (Sybase DB)
SAP CRM 7.0 EHP2 (Sybase DB)
SAP Content server 6.5 (Max DB)
And we have plan to implement Fiori applications as well in HR,MM and FI areas. My major requiremnt is, can we acheive SAP SSO to all above SAP solutions without integrating with LDAP/Active directory.
The idea is once end user login to his PC/laptop, he should not prompt any user name/password while logging on to ABAP (ECC, BI, Solman,CRM) and EP,BO,Solman and CRM portals.
I got information that we can achieve this using SAP NW SSO 2.0, But not 100 % sure that we can achieve this without integrating with LDAP/Active directory.
Incase Active directory integration is mandatory to acheive above requirement, please confirm.
FYI, in my environment we have 4 different companies with different active directory accounts but all are going to use the same SAP landscape as mentioned above. How to proceed AD integration incase it is mandatory.
Your reccomendations/advises will be a great help for my team. Looking forward for postive replies.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Praveen P
↧
Re: GR issue for inbound delivery created throught SPED output
You must not mix different approaches in reception against inbound delivery, It is your task in the design to set the rules whether you want to use MIGO or VL32N to do the GR.
MIGO does not update the document flow, that is the message, which can be changed from error to even not be shown in OMCQ in case you do not care about the missing information in your document flow
↧
Re: Need Help - Getting a new Developer Hana edition
Does anyone know what are the minimum requirements of the AWS to run SAP Hana. I want to try it out, but I want to know which would be the smallest server I can get to be able to use this. I will be paying the server time myself and I want to keep my costs to the minimum.
Thanks in advance
↧
↧
Auditing Report Views - discrepancy
I'm trying to compare Crystal Report views for February 2014 and February 2015. We had BOE3 in 2014 and have BOE4 now. There is a very large discrepancy in the view count. One folder shows 268 total views for 2015 and the same folder shows 3,279 views for 2014. In fact, all view numbers are much lower when collecting data from BOE4.
For BOE3 using the Activity universe: I'm using the Event Type Description: "Report Viewing Succeded" along with "Object Folder Path", User Name, Event ID and Start Time.
For BOE4: I'm using Event Type "View", Object Name, User Name, Action ID and Start Time.
I have "Set Events" at "Default" for BOE4 Auditing and User Group Details and Folder Path Details checked.
What am I missing? There can't be THAT much of a viewing discrepancy between BOE3 and BOE4.
Thanks in advance.
↧
Re: Any known constraints to use LIFO/FIFO for Inventory valuation in SAP for Retail?
Hello Paresh Ashar,
In SAP, there are two types of inventory Valuations: Standard Price and Moving Average Price. SAP recommends using Moving Average Price for Retail and for Raw Materials in Manufacturing. This is to reflect market price changes in inventory valuation. Standard Price method is usually used for Finished Goods. LIFO/FIFO methods are used for Goods Issues from storage locations.
Thanks,
Venu
↧
Re: Workflow not triggering from my ID
Hello,
I find that screenshot very hard to read. Anyway, the very first status is In Process, not Completed.
You have already marked this thread as Answered. You should start a new thread (since it's a new question), there is more chance of a response.
regards
Rick
↧
Repeat outer subforms on page-break (nested subforms)
Hi guys,
I have the following hierarchy:
The client wants Contract Number (RECNNR) and Due Date (BLINEDATE) to be repeated in case of a page-break in ItemRow. Is this possible with deep-structures?
Regards,
Raúl
↧
↧
Re: Ajustar horário no SAP.
Giovani eu forcei o DST para para ficar -02:00 simulando o horário de verão, nesse caso a emissão do XML fica com uma hora a mais.
Com isso a solicitação de cancelamento (momento real da recepção na SEFAZ) está uma hora a menos e da o erro 577= data do evento menos que a emissão, com isso tenho de esperar uma hora para que o momento da solicitação supere a hora da emissão da NF-e.
Conclui que isso ocorre porque eu aumentei uma hora na emissão "Simulando DST", mas o SVAN não está em horário de verão (óbvio).. O horário de recepção do cancelamento na SEFAZ é menor que o dhEmi da NF-e. Por isso tive de esperar uma hora. até superar o dhEmi.
Conclusão.
ECC
O sistema operacional não vai entrar em horário de verão.
Na Filial vai ser ajustado um TZONE com DST.
Na STZAC será colocado TZONE sem DST para user/sistema para que todos os registros seja em hora local.
GRC
O sistema operacional não vai entrar em horário de verão.
Na STZAC vai ficar com TZONE com DST
Para usuários que acessa os monitores WEB será colocado um TZONE sem DST
Vou terminar mais um teste e dou um feedback com mais resultado.
ATT
RR.
↧
Re: Printing Report in Portrait format
Can you please share solution for this issue?
Thanks.
↧
Dias festivos
Buenas Tardes
Aquí con una duda resulta que en la empresa que laboro se pagan 4 prestadoras y en una de ellas los días festivos son diferentes a las demás.
Se procedió a la configuración de otro calendario de festivos y después en "Fijar reglas para plan de horario de trabajo y planes de horario de trabajo" se saco una copia a un horario que le tocan estos festivos (se le puso otro nombre)
Se le asigno el nuevo horario al empleado con fecha del siguiente periodo
Al calcular nomina manda el siguiente mensaje
"Error de customizing en regla de plan de horario de trabajo 2 Z2 32 FR53", el FR53 es el horario que tenia asignado en el ultimo periodo calculado.
Por lo que estuve investigando en internet esto esta relacionado con evaluación de tiempos y menciona que "véase la guía de implementación (img) de la gestión de tiempos" pero no encuentro nada de esto.
Si pudieran explicarme que es lo que me esta faltando de aplicar para poder continuar, la otra duda es que si al sacar una copia del horario (donde se le asigna el nuevo calendario de festivos) debe ser con otro nombre
Gracias por su atención
Octavio Dávila Durazo
↧
Re: QA32/QA11 user decision should pop up LT06 screen
QA32 and QA11 are transactions from the Quality module, but only transactions from inventory management module are enabled to jump into LT06 screen.
For reference see OSS note 387466 - LT06 is not accessed although T321-TAFKZ = 'X'
↧
↧
How to Exclude an Account from the script
Hi BPC Experts,
Below script, captures 403 DIVACCOUNTs as below.
Deposits - DA_221101
Lending - DA_211101
Current Account - DA_221102
Plus around 400 accounts.
From the above 403 accounts, I have to exclude the Current Account - DA_221102 alone for the Flow: FL_AVG_CLO_ADJ in the below script.
How can I make the change in the below script or in the dimension property.
Below script should exclude the FLOW = FL_AVG_CLO_ADJ, just only for the Current Account - DA_221102. For all other DIVACCOUNTS, it should consider the FLOW = FL_AVG_CLO_ADJ.
Advise me, please. Enclosed the screen shot for ref.
Exclude this FLOW.bmp shows the flow which needs to be excluded in the transfer from Source model to Reporting model.
Flow.bmp shows the FLOW = FL_AVG_CLO_ADJ .
DIVACCOUNT shows the account ids.
Logic Script:
*SELECT (%CATYP%,"[CAT_TYPE_CALC]","CATEGORY","[ID] = %CATEGORY_SET%")
*SELECT (%TIMMBERS%,"[ID]","TIME","[%CATYP%]='F'")
*SELECT (%DACMBERS%,"[ID]","DIVACCOUNT","[REPORT_ACC]<>''")
*XDIM_MEMBERSET BOOK=BAS(BK_ALL)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET DATASRC=BAS(DS_MGT_TOTAL)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET DETAIL=BAS(DT_ALL)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET DIVACCOUNT=%DACMBERS%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET DIVOWNVIEW=BAS(DO_TOT)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET FLOW=BAS(FL_CLO),FL_NONE,FL_AVG_CLO_ADJ
*XDIM_MEMBERSET REPRICING=<ALL>
*XDIM_MEMBERSET RPTCURRENCY=LC
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TIME=%TIMMBERS%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TRNCURRENCY=BAS(TOTAL_CUR)
*DESTINATION_APP = Reporting
*SKIP_DIM = BOOK,DIVOWNVIEW,REPRICING
*RENAME_DIM DIVACCOUNT=ACCOUNT
*WHEN DIVACCOUNT
*IS *
*REC(DATASRC=DS_DIVROI,ENTITY=ENTITY.DIV_TO_REP,DIVACCOUNT=DIVACCOUNT.REPORT_ACC)
*ENDWHEN
*COMMIT
↧
Re: Synchronization Tool notes and updates - TaxFactory 10
Yes, so far this is what I've found... Tax Authority Mappings only occur with 'Productive' runs of the client-specific tool, even if you tick the box to update the mappings only and nothing else. The 'Productive' checkbox is greyed out unless the client is open for client-specific changes. In theory, this activity shouldn't need to happen very often, but it does happen once in a while.
↧
Lesson Learned - SAP SOP 3.0.2.2 On-Premise - Must Read
Dear Community,
We had Sev 1 issue in our production system after system upgraded last night from 3.0.2.1 and 3.0.2.2...
Before upgrade :
Most of master data and Key figure data jobs ran in parallel ( Informatica ETL and loading data from staging table to core table) and we had old failed jobs in the que (select * from SAP_SFND."sap.sop.sopfnd.catalogue::SOPBG_CRON_JOB_ENTRY" where CRON_JOB_STATUS = 1
and CRON_JOB_TYPE = 'INTEGRATION') (Successful jobs have CRON_JOB_STATUS = 0)
What changed in this patch
With 3.0.2.2,
1) Data load jobs one by one
2) Current Job doesn't start unless previous job is run successfully..Current job stuck in the que with status “OUTSIDE_UPLOAD”.
What needs to be done
1) We had to change stuck job's status to "0"
2) After this fix, que got cleared and all data loads happened correctly.
Ref to OSS note 2136871 ( IBP Note and New parameter - Job_Thread_Count if you want to enable parallel threading and this option is not available in 3.0.2.2, as of now)
Thanks to SAP support team who identified the issue quickly and gave the direction....
Good luck 
Thanks,
Krishna
.
↧
Re: MRP: Question on Delivery date vs. Release date
The planned delivery time is calendar days, not workdays, hence the determination of delivery date of 20.04.2015 has a different starting point than the creation date, as 09.04.2015 + 7 days would be 16.04.2015 as delivery date.
On the other hand is delivery date 20.04.2015 - 7 calender days delivery time accurate by giving you a release date of 13.04.2015.
↧
↧
Re: SQL Server 2014 compatibility with SAP B1
Version 9.1 support SQL server 2014.
My organization is running on 8.82 on SQL server and we are on SQL server 2005. It would be nice to have support for version 8.82 and 9.0 as to allow organizations to migrate with minimal interruption.
↧
Re: xi4.1 Context Issue
hi ,
can you please attach snapshot of query property?
↧
Re: BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for asset posting
Hi,
i can suggest you that you can do this with BDC recording,I think it's good way to this.
It will solve your problem easily.
Regards
Prakash
↧