Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8741 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: SQL error: Internal database error *** ERROR *** Assertion failed: 201501 (10.0.1.3415)

$
0
0

Hi Doug,

 

To access KBAs, you need to use an SAP S-User, which is registered with a valid and active SAP support account (the same account you would use to open a technical support incident with us at http://support.sap.com/ ). This is not the same login you would use for the SCN.

 

For more information, see: User Data Administration - Help | SAP Support Portal

 

Back to my issue...  Say there is no valid backup and that the assertion error was reported on the schedules table--which contains most of the application's data.

Would it be possible to recover the database and most of the data in the schedules table?

 

Possibly. You need to use "dbunload -e schedules" and then see if you can select any remaining data using available keys/indexes on that table. e.g. for "SalesOrderItems" in the demo database:

 

   UNLOAD
     SELECT * FROM "GROUPO"."SalesOrderItems"
     ORDER BY "ID" ASC
   TO 'c:\\unload\\SalesOrderItems.dat';


   UNLOAD
     SELECT * FROM "GROUPO"."SalesOrderItems"
     ORDER BY "ID" DESC
   TO 'c:\\unload\\SalesOrderItems.dat'
    APPEND ON;

 

If "SalesOrderItems" was corrupted, both of these commands will create the assertion error again and you will need to restart the database each time.

 

The KBA linked goes into the details about the entire process to use and how to try and restore the database from this data.

 

If 'schedules' is the main table of the database though, I imagine you will have lots of foreign key relationships that are now broken and you will have to resolve these manually...

 

Regards,

 

Jeff Albion

SAP Active Global Support


Re: Validate password passed from Fiori APP

Re: storage permit -emission control how sap can handle in sap ehs or ehsm

$
0
0

Dear Krishna

 

anything what is known (in SCN) about EHSM 6.0 is shown here:Ramp-Up component extension for SAP Environment, Health, and Safety Management 6.0

 

I have "heard" and "understood" that EHMS 6.0 is the next step to "integrate" old solutions in the new framework, One old solution is "Environmental compliance 3.0"

 

Sp may be: check SAP Marketplace to get some insight in the new features as available (if you are willing to participate in ramp up; if you are not willigin to do so; you need to wait untikl the new version is released generally (which can be expected in most cases in 4 quarter this year)

C.B.

Re: Fiori bandwidth

Re: After post into 911 stroage type mateial don't get cosume

$
0
0

hi Manish kumar

thanks for your reply.

Normal scenario

1) i do GR, TO gets generate and confirm

2) stock is available in Bin

3) issue the goods to cost center. stock gets consumed. no stock in bin now

 

the above same is done by cross dock as follow

 

1)     1)  I Tick pre-allocated stock to be considered in 101 mvt type.

2)      2) I maintained in table through LT51

3)      3) Done GRN, TO created and confirmed (LT06).

4) Now material is available 911 storage type and the cost center BIN

But here doubt is, if confirm the TO, material have to consume. Should not show in stock. But it shows the stock in consumption storage type and bin. If go in TO detail that show +sign of material quantity. Actually need to show – sign then only stock would get consume. How to overcome this problem.?

 

Regards

Karan

Re: Work around ORA - 01795

$
0
0

Hi Veena,

 

You can create a sub-query in your situation because Oracle will not allow more then 1000 rows for In operation.

 

Just in case you will find any difficulties then do let me know.

 

Thanks,

Swapnil

Re: Activate or Deactivate System-Alias based cache

$
0
0

Hi Facundo,

 

/IWBEP/CACHE_CLEANUP : For backend service cache cleanup

/IWFND/CACHE_CLEANUP - For frontend service metadata cache cleanup.

 

Regards,

Tejas

How many process code we can assign into a message type and idoc type

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have a requirement in idoc, we have existing partner's sender and receiver. But our client wants from our outbound setup will same but in inbound setup just add one more partner.so we are copied inbound part from exist partner and changed that partner number.but we need to change that function module inside the process code for as per our client requirement.If we are changing function module in our new partner the changes effecting old partner also because process code is same.

 

So i have one doubt if we create a new process code and assign to that messages type how system will behave. it can capture both process code or it can only one.or we need to create both message type and idoc type.

 

Anyone can help me for this requirement.

 

Thanks,


ALE/IDOC:Passing transactional/custom data changes

$
0
0

HI experts;

I need to pass transactional/custom data changes from one system to another.

I cant use change pointer for this as change pointer is only for master data.

I will be thankful for kindly guiding through this.

 

Thanks,

Sanjay

How we pass values to /o transaction in Personas 2.0

$
0
0

Hi Experts ,

 

Our requirement is to launch a transaction in a browser session with some pre-popluated values . II am able to pass the values in /n transaction but values are getting lost with /o transaction .

 

Thanks

Shivani

Re: aggregation error

Re: Download the entire project for https://sapui5.hana.ondemand.com/sdk/#content

$
0
0

Hi Kumar, yes, you can download complete SDK from OpenUI5 from here: OpenUI5 - Download

 

it includes all applications of demo, documentation...

 

Regards,

Pau

Re: How to get the technical information F1

$
0
0

Hi Abul,

thank you very much for your reply

I will try it out and tell you

Re: MRP is not consdiring production orders for net requirement process

Re: EDI - IDOC functionality

$
0
0

Thanks Rajit,

I will go through it...


Re: Documented goods movements not showing in production order header

$
0
0

Hello

 

First of all, I'm the moderator of this space and I see that you have a few old thread that were answered but that were not closed. Can you please review your old threads and close the ones that were already solved by selecting the correct answer?

 

http://scn.sap.com/community/support/blog/2013/04/03/how-to-close-a-discussion-and-why

 

 

Considering this question, if the flags on OPL8 were checked after posting the goods movement, the goods movement will not be displayed on the documented goods movement screen.

 

If the flags were checked when you posted the goods movement, check if you ca find the goods movements on table AUFM, where the order documented goods movements are stored.

 

If there is no record on AUFM, maybe the goods movements were not correctly posted, in this case, you should check for reprocessing records on transaction COGI and CO1P.

 

Regards

Caetano

Re: Components inspection at the picking and before consumption

$
0
0

Hi Patrick,

 

Sorry, I beg to defer form your understanding here.

 

The component items you are talking about,  should follow inspection process either while procuring form outside or materials should be inspected in-house for sub-assembly production. Both are very much standard process and uses inspection type "01" or "04" respectively. In some cases for testing the in-process quality business may also may be interested to check the "03" inspection types. And I believe, on top of that for testing some exceptional scenarios, you can still introduce manual inspection types "89". For some shelf-life managed components, business may also use recurring inspection type "09" which ensures that whatever material is available in store is Good to be used during production. With all these steps, if implemented the component quality can be ensured itself.

 

On top of that, if you still need to check the specific component quality you can furthermore introduce "02" inspection type as a valid way of testing the component quality. Now I d not understand, why is this not a valid case. Aren't you not using the other upstream quality management process? Please can you also confirm what is the subsequent process being followed at your business, I mean how you first take care (or wish to do...) of the component inspection and then do the production process. At what stage you do MvT 261, confirmation of operations, MvT 101, Final Inspection creation?

 

 

In case if you wish NOT TO USE INSPECTION TYPE "02", then I can suggest you to trigger a  BAPI/FM QPL1_INSPECTION_LOT_CREATE, immediately after production order is released. This FM should consider all the component materials and create manual inspection lots "89", where the components will not be consumed against production order.

 

 

Only tricky thing about such an enhancement will be like how to manage the subsequent downstream process. I mean, Once the manual inspection lots 89 are created for components, how will you ensure that all these inspection lots are result recorded and UD made, so that you can start the confirmation and GR process for production order!! To do this check, you can further make a note that the Production order is introduced as a text item in the manual inspection lots. Now during GR for Production order, it should first check this text field and find out all the 89 inspection lots for the production order components linked to it. In case if all the 89 inspection lots are not UD = A, then GR can't be posted.

 

Please can you check if this option is feasible for your business.

 

Thanks,

Arijit

Re: MRP is not consdiring production orders for net requirement process

Re: SMTP - Send emails: Hide username

$
0
0

Hi Bruno,

 

I hope it is due to  If an SAP user does not have an Internet mail address maintained , a sender address consisting of the SAP user name and this domain is generated.

 

Can you check in SU01d-->Address tab(Email) for the mentioned id.If not please maintain it and try.

 

Hope it helps.

 

Regards,

Kannan

 

Re: EWA Alerts Sections

$
0
0

Hi Balaji,

 

Follow the below steps :

 

- Run the lmdb transaction

- Select the corresponding Product system.

- Goto the host

- If your data about the host is present(such as CPU, VM) , then you will able to see the hardware capacity in EWA.

 

With Regards

Ashutosh Chaturvedi

Viewing all 8741 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>